Why this matters

Protests are used across causes from climate change to animal welfare, yet advocates and funders receive little rigorous guidance on which strategies actually work. With research on protest outcomes suggesting that movements can shift public opinion, voting behaviour, and policy, understanding what drives success has real implications for how change happens.

What we found

The clearest finding across all methods is that nonviolent tactics significantly outperform violent ones: several studies show that violent protest reduces public support and can even shift opinion against a movement's goals. Protest size is also a strong driver of success - particularly in influencing policymakers, who use turnout as a signal of public concern. A third major factor is external context: having elite allies, favourable public opinion, and good timing can matter as much as anything a movement controls.

Other factors - diversity, radical flank dynamics, internal organisational capacity, and team experience - appear potentially important but are supported by thinner evidence. The report also notes a meaningful gap between what is measurable and what may matter most.

What it means for advocates and funders

Movements and grantmakers should prioritise building genuine scale and maintaining strict nonviolence. Internal organisational capacity - governance, experienced leadership, scalable systems - is underresearched but may be a key determinant of success. The report also flags climate change and animal welfare as particularly suited to grassroots movement efforts.

Read the full report

The findings above are a summary. The full report, including methodology and supporting evidence, is available on socialchangelab.org.

Read the report
Movement Strategy